- Letter
- Go Mobile »
- Access by Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Bremen
Higher-order interactions promote chimera states
Phys. Rev. E 105, L042202 – Published 21 April, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.L042202
Abstract
Since the discovery of chimera states, the presence of a nonzero phase lag parameter turns out to be an essential attribute for the emergence of chimeras in a nonlocally coupled identical Kuramoto phase oscillators' network with pairwise interactions. In this Letter, we report the emergence of chimeras without phase lag in a nonlocally coupled identical Kuramoto network owing to the introduction of nonpairwise interactions. The influence of added nonlinearity in the coupled system dynamics in the form of simplicial complexes mitigates the requisite of a nonzero phase lag parameter for the emergence of chimera states. Chimera states stimulated by the reciprocity of the pairwise and nonpairwise interaction strengths and their multistable nature are characterized with appropriate measures and are demonstrated in the parameter spaces.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Introduction. Many natural and human-made systems in physics, biology, engineering, and social sciences are modeled as networks, the constituents of which are represented as dynamical systems interacting among themselves through various links. The interplay of the network configuration and the underlying dynamical processes often gives rise to various nonlinear collective phenomena that have immense applicability across wide disciplines. So far, the connectivity among the dynamical elements of such a complex system has been mostly described by interactions within a pair of nodes. However, recent progresses in complex system research have significantly highlighted the prominence of nonpairwise interactions in addition to pairwise interactions. In several real networks, such as brain networks , social networks , ecological interaction , random walks , scientific collaboration networks , and social contagion , simple pairwise interactions may not be sufficient to unravel the prevailing physical mechanisms. The inherent dynamical processes are efficiently captured while taking into account higher-order interactions , that have been widely adopted in the literatures, recently.
A simplicial complex , formed by simplices of different dimensions, is one such topological framework that is often used to represent the underlying structural configuration of higher-order interaction networks. The interaction among
Synchronization is one such collective phenomenon where the interactions among the dynamical entities play a crucial role. Recent investigations reveal how the presence of higher-order interactions affects the transition scenario to synchronization and also triggers the emergence of various synchronization states. The Kuramoto phase oscillator is considered as the simplest model for describing the synchronization phenomena, which when generalized in a network setup with higher-order interactions promotes the emergence of explosive synchronization , complete synchronization , cluster synchronization , etc.
An intriguing collective dynamics where both the synchronization and desynchronization states coexist simultaneously is known as the chimera state , that results from the symmetry breaking of the network. The emergence of this exotic state has been massively explored by considering diverse network topologies and coupling configurations , in the last two decades. However, these studies are concentrated only on networks having pairwise interaction. Very recently, Zhang et al. , as an application to their proposed unified theory for stability analysis of synchronization patterns, reported the emergence of chimera states in networks of optoelectronic oscillators in the presence of nonpairwise interactions.
Until now, innumerable studies in networks with pairwise interactions have confirmed the crucial importance of a nonzero phase lag parameter, in order to observe chimera states in networks of nonlocally coupled identical Kuramoto phase oscillators. These fascinating chimera states are indeed possible without the presence of phase lag, however the network cannot be simply coupled nonlocally with identical oscillators . Either some nonhomogeneity should be introduced among the individual oscillators or the coupling configuration should differ from that of the usual nonlocal topology. In contrast to this, in this Letter we report the emergence of chimera states in nonlocally coupled identical Kuramoto phase oscillators in the absence of the crucial phase lag parameter, when the limit of pairwise interactions is removed. Specifically, in this Letter, we consider coupled oscillator simplicial complexes with nonlocal interaction, and explore the impact of two-simplexes and three-simplexes (see Supplemental Material ) on the advent of chimera states. Taking into account the higher-order interaction terms, our investigation unveils that chimera states can be observed extensively without phase lag. In fact, we found that the chimera region broadens in the parameter space with the increase of the nonpairwise interaction strength. The influence of initial conditions has already been well established in the literature for the emergence of chimera states in pairwise interacting networks . Here, we observe that the variation of initial conditions in the presence of higher-order interactions promotes the coexistence of multiple states, which are characterized by quantifying the basin stability of those states. Further, we explore the most probable route of transition from incoherent to coherent dynamics as the two-body interaction strength increases in the presence of higher-order interaction.
Nonlocally coupled higher-order Kuramoto network. To explore the effect of higher-order interaction on the emergence of chimera states, we consider a network of
where
In the following, we explore the consequences of introducing higher-order interactions in the classical nonlocally coupled Kuramoto phase oscillator network without any phase lag. In this Letter, we consider the network size
Results. First, we execute the analysis by considering
(a) Spatiotemporal evolution of the observed chimera state in the absence of phase lag in a nonlocally coupled higher-order Kuramoto phase oscillator network with two-simplex interaction. The colorbar corresponds to the state of the phase variable
In order to properly distinguish the three different parametric regimes corresponding to the three different dynamical states, namely, coherent, chimera, and incoherent, we adopt the conventional statistical measure strength of incoherence (SI) , which is calculated using the following formula:
where
Here, the variable
Characterization of three different dynamical states, namely, incoherent (IN), chimera (CH), and coherent (CO) states as an interplay of the one-simplex and two-simplex interaction strengths
(a) Demonstration of the various stability regions in the
Additionally, we also investigate the transition route from synchronized to desynchronized dynamics as
Transition from coherent to incoherent dynamics (from left to right) when the two-simplex interaction strength
We look for some theoretical insights into the observed chimera dynamics by using the Ott-Antonsen (OA) approach in the thermodynamic limit
where
Here
Also, the order parameters
The evolution of the variable
(a) Snapshot of the chimera state for the pairwise and triangular interaction strengths
simulations is illustrated in Fig. . This figure substantiates the validation of the higher-order dynamics through the theoretically predicted order parameter values that are in good agreement with the numerically simulated dynamics of the system at least for a particular choice of the interaction strengths. In addition, the transition phenomena among the various dynamical states are exhibited in Fig. on the basis of SI measurements and theoretically derived values of order parameter
Characterization of the incoherent (IN), chimera (CH), and coherent (CO) region depending on the values of
Conclusion. Until now, chimera states have been investigated extensively from the perspective of networks where the dynamics is associated to the nodes and the interactions among the dynamical units are represented only by the links joining a pair of nodes. Previous research in this context confirms the necessity of an additional phase lag parameter to develop a chimera pattern in a nonlocally coupled network of identical Kuramoto phase oscillators. Presently, the rising interest in exploring various synchronization phenomena considering networks with nonpairwise interactions fosters the idea of investigating the emergence of fascinating chimera states in a network with higher-order interactions. In this Letter, we discover the unusual occurrence of coexisting synchronous and asynchronous dynamics in the absence of phase lag in a nonlocally coupled identical Kuramoto network incorporating higher-dimensional interactions. Specifically, we adopted the simplicial complex network topology and scrutinized the impact of higher-order simplexes on the emergence of distinct collective states like synchronization, desynchronization, and chimera states. Considering
Supplemental Material
supplemental.pdf file contains the results for the emergence of chimera states considering 3-simplex interaction for P = 3.
References (72)
- M. E. Newman, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003).
- S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
- A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Phys. Rep. 469, 93 (2008).
- A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series, Series Number 12 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
- M. J. Panaggio and D. M. Abrams, Nonlinearity 28, R67 (2015).
- G. Saxena, A. Prasad, and R. Ramaswamy, Phys. Rep. 521, 205 (2012).
- T. Carletti, D. Fanelli, and S. Nicoletti, J. Phys. Complex. 1, 035006 (2020).
- F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lucas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Phys. Rep. 874, 1 (2020).
- G. Petri, P. Expert, F. Turkheimer, R. Carhart-Harris, D. Nutt, P. J. Hellyer, and F. Vaccarino, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140873 (2014).
- A. E. Sizemore, C. Giusti, A. Kahn, J. M. Vettel, R. F. Betzel, and D. S. Bassett, J. Comput. Neurosci. 44, 115 (2018).
- A. R. Benson, D. F. Gleich, and J. Leskovec, Science 353, 163 (2016).
- J. Grilli, G. Barabás, M. J. Michalska-Smith, and S. Allesina, Nature (London) 548, 210 (2017).
- T. Carletti, F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, and D. Fanelli, Phys. Rev. E 101, 022308 (2020).
- A. Patania, G. Petri, and F. Vaccarino, EPJ Data Sci. 6, 18 (2017).
- I. Iacopini, G. Petri, A. Barrat, and V. Latora, Nat. Commun. 10, 2485 (2019).
- G. Bianconi, Higher-Order Networks (Elements in Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks) (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
- L. Torres, A. S. Blevins, D. Bassett, and T. Eliassi-Rad, SIAM Rev. 63, 435 (2021).
- F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Ferraz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno et al., Nat. Phys. 17, 1093 (2021).
- C. Giusti, R. Ghrist, and D. S. Bassett, J. Comput. Neurosci. 41, 1 (2016).
- V. Salnikov, D. Cassese, and R. Lambiotte, Eur. J. Phys. 40, 014001 (2018).
- J. J. Torres and G. Bianconi, J. Phys. Complex. 1, 015002 (2020).
- T. Tanaka and T. Aoyagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 224101 (2011).
- P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 248301 (2019).
- A. P. Millán, J. J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 218301 (2020).
- M. Lucas, G. Cencetti, and F. Battiston, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033410 (2020).
- L. V. Gambuzza, F. Di Patti, L. Gallo, S. Lepri, M. Romance, R. Criado, M. Frasca, V. Latora, and S. Boccaletti, Nat. Commun. 12, 1255 (2021).
- P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Commun. Phys. 3, 218 (2020).
- R. Ghorbanchian, J. G. Restrepo, J. J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Commun. Phys. 4, 120 (2021).
- Y. Zhang, V. Latora, and A. E. Motter, Commun. Phys. 4, 195 (2021).
- S. Boccaletti, A. N. Pisarchik, C. I. Del Genio, and A. Amann, Synchronization: From Coupled Systems to Complex Networks (Cambridge University, New York, 2018).
- Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Courier, New York, 2003).
- F. A. Rodrigues, T. K. D. Peron, P. Ji, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rep. 610, 1 (2016).
- Y. Kuramoto and D. Battogtokh, Nonlinear Phenom. Complex Syst. 5, 380 (2002).
- D. M. Abrams and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 174102 (2004).
- C. R. Laing, Chaos 19, 013113 (2009).
- E. A. Martens, C. R. Laing, and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 044101 (2010).
- S. Kundu, S. Majhi, B. K. Bera, D. Ghosh, and M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 97, 022201 (2018).
- M. J. Panaggio and D. M. Abrams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 094102 (2013).
- O. E. Omel'chenko, M. Wolfrum, S. Yanchuk, Y. L. Maistrenko, and O. Sudakov, Phys. Rev. E 85, 036210 (2012).
- S. Kundu, B. K. Bera, D. Ghosh, and M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 99, 022204 (2019).
- M. J. Panaggio and D. M. Abrams, Phys. Rev. E 91, 022909 (2015).
- S. Kundu, P. Muruganandam, D. Ghosh, and M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 103, 062209 (2021).
- V. V. Makarov, S. Kundu, D. V. Kirsanov, N. S. Frolov, V. A. Maksimenko, D. Ghosh, S. K. Dana, and A. E. Hramov, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 71, 118 (2019).
- Y. Zhu, Z. Zheng, and J. Yang, Phys. Rev. E 89, 022914 (2014).
- S. Ghosh, A. Kumar, A. Zakharova, and S. Jalan, EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 115, 60005 (2016).
- S. Majhi, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, Chaos 27, 073109 (2017).
- J. Hizanidis, N. E. Kouvaris, G. Zamora-López, A. Díaz-Guilera, and C. G. Antonopoulos, Sci. Rep. 6, 19845 (2016).
- B. K. Bera, S. Majhi, D. Ghosh, and M. Perc, EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 118, 10001 (2017).
- C. R. Laing, Phys. Rev. E 92, 050904(R) (2015).
- B. K. Bera, D. Ghosh, P. Parmananda, G. Osipov, and S. K. Dana, Chaos 27, 073108 (2017).
- D. M. Abrams and S. H. Strogatz, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 16, 21 (2006).
- J. Hizanidis, V. G. Kanas, A. Bezerianos, and T. Bountis, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 24, 1450030 (2014).
- S. Nkomo, M. R. Tinsley, and K. Showalter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 244102 (2013).
- O. E. Omel'chenko, Y. L. Maistrenko, and P. A. Tass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 044105 (2008).
- L. Schmidt, K. Schönleber, K. Krischer, and V. García-Morales, Chaos 24, 013102 (2014).
- G. C. Sethia and A. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 144101 (2014).
- A. Mishra, C. Hens, M. Bose, P. K. Roy, and S. K. Dana, Phys. Rev. E 92, 062920 (2015).
- Y. L. Maistrenko, A. Vasylenko, O. Sudakov, R. Levchenko, and V. L. Maistrenko, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 24, 1440014 (2014).
- C. R. Laing, Physica D 238, 1569 (2009).
- H. Wang and X. Li, Phys. Rev. E 83, 066214 (2011).
- N. Frolov, V. Maksimenko, S. Majhi, S. Rakshit, D. Ghosh, and A. Hramov, Chaos 30, 081102 (2020).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.L042202 for a brief description of the emergence of chimera states considering three-simplex interaction for
. - E. A. Martens, M. J. Panaggio, and D. M. Abrams, New J. Phys. 18, 022002 (2016).
- S. Rakshit, B. K. Bera, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, Sci. Rep. 7, 2412 (2017).
- V. Dos Santos, F. S. Borges, K. C. Iarosz, I. L. Caldas, J. Szezech, R. L. Viana, M. S. Baptista, and A. M. Batista, Chaos 30, 083115 (2020).
- Z. Faghani, Z. Arab, F. Parastesh, S. Jafari, M. Perc, and M. Slavinec, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 114, 306 (2018).
- The random numbers are generated using the rand() function in fortran for a fixed seed equal to
. - R. Gopal, V. K. Chandrasekar, A. Venkatesan, and M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 89, 052914 (2014).
- E. Ott and T. M. Antonsen, Chaos 18, 037113 (2008).
- S. A. Marvel, R. E. Mirollo, and S. H. Strogatz, Chaos 19, 043104 (2009).
- H. Hong and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. E 84, 046202 (2011).
- C. Xu, H. Xiang, J. Gao, and Z. Zheng, Sci. Rep. 6, 31133 (2016).